Marxism and dialectical reading
Dialectical reading is the sum of read operations and prospecting carried out by Marx, on the texts of intellectual and philosophical ideas of the time or the earlier and, therefore, interpretation of the experience of nature that characterized the cash Marx's thought and made him reach a developed and disclosures in the fields of his scientific thought and politics, philosophy, economics, history and literature.
If "Louis Althuser" praises the efforts of intellectual high of Marx in his great book "capital," adding that Marx did not have to read the texts of the innocent for his contemporaries, and their ideas, a starting point, from Marx's own concept on pragmatic, reading other people's ideas rather than through them or from them , but for its own advantage, the "Jacques Derrida" in his book "The spectrum of Marx," is trying, hard, to present Marx as "Tvkikia" was dissected structures, property and removes them in favor of the dialectical concept of history and nature.
This concept of Marx, "the reader", whether at "Althuser" or "Jacques Derrida" or "Cheraus" or the proposals of thinkers of postmodernism, or some who fall Marx benefits of knowledge or specific goals, it was not, as Marx seems to mean it or intended it, but Marx does not deny the importance of reading the special monetary and scientific extrapolation of the ideas of his contemporaries or his predecessors historical audits.
It was Marx is concerned, we read that the controversial and soak in all texts are written, they rarely find the letter and has no one was based on "response" of cash or "controversy" intellectual or "modify" and "correction" on "another" may seem To some, that this way of writing that is based on the latest reading it, but it is a socket on Marx and accused of failing to copyright free or creative generation, but the reality is otherwise; the dialectical process of reading, requiring a high effort in research and exploration, and significant capabilities in adversity or refute the propositions reconstruction and Asthalabha to suit the new scientific thought.
Marx was an avid reader, a reader - a different concept was able to draw material from many sources, different schools of thought and different philosophical, reading Marx's "Hegel", but gives us an appropriate model for careful reading philosophy, Marx was keen to understand and match, as Hegelian thought, then moved to a long web pages for the purpose of codification of well-examined and re-development of it, in the manuscripts (1844) is no substitute for a laboratory to view a model of philosophical reading difficult, the ancient philosophical - the economic progress of the main stages of the dialectical reading, by adopting the following:
1 - display modes.
2 - the accuracy of references.
3 - Comment text limits.
4 - Interpretation through interpretation.
5 - show the opposite through Trouhp philosophical.
6 - Conclusion Open executable to increase.
7 - followed by enrichment history.
That these phases are falling upon them, sometimes uneven, sometimes collectively characterized the work of Marx and Engels in "German ideology" as well as early in their book "Critique of the Holy Family" and manuscripts in the science of political economy as well as in Marx's work was important "Poverty of Philosophy" in responding to Proudhon as show us, alas, way, "CT" based on any objective view of the book "Syllables," Vmokta .. And accuracy in the review section of the same comment more then "Bhdodh" and interpreted more and show antibody - a controversial event, and this way, almost, that is to be provided in all other works, except many pages of "capital", which was singled out for measurements logical rules or scientific or economic data and basic mathematical equations.
Marxism, faithful to its sources, not Marx, helpless, if desired, to conceal these main sources, or little, not often touched upon, there is a special reading material benefit of the eighteenth century and brief him on the classical German philosophy, and employing materialistic Diallkittik Feuerbach and Hegel, not be overlooked statements of the physical. And Darwin's theory of evolution, as well as benefited from Engels and a friend of the proposals of Mr. Morgan about the origin of the family, private property, the state and not overlooked aspects of English political economy of socialism and Jehadeh tagged French utopian socialism, Engels did not ignore Mr. Dühring in Achtrakith fabricated, in addition to that, the Marx did not not ignore the messages and exchange views with leading thinkers and philosophers of his time.
All of this Herculean effort but it is a dialectical process was able to provide significant objective summary of the biggest philosophical concept known to the world, Marxism in the past, present and future. That Marxism, if in the theoretical basis, but is a scientific theory based on the continuing dialectical reading curriculum, and not the theory of unilateral or with attempts to narrow, specific or Regional news. It is a dialectical reading, she was able to provide a model lesson ahead of the lessons of reading and receiving global intellectual discourse in a reading suitable for reading at any time and place.
Bodybuilding spirit
الأربعاء أبريل 01, 2015 8:08 am من طرف بوح الروح
» * * * * * * الحُــــبّ
الأربعاء أبريل 01, 2015 8:06 am من طرف بوح الروح
» * * * * * وبيسألوني ... !!!
الأربعاء أبريل 01, 2015 8:04 am من طرف بوح الروح
» * * * * * * في بلادنا ..
الأربعاء أبريل 01, 2015 7:59 am من طرف بوح الروح
» * * * * * في بلادي ..
الأربعاء أبريل 01, 2015 7:57 am من طرف بوح الروح
» * * * * * * في بلادي ...
الأربعاء أبريل 01, 2015 7:55 am من طرف بوح الروح
» * * * * * * في بلادي ..
الأربعاء أبريل 01, 2015 7:53 am من طرف بوح الروح
» * * * * * قالوا لي ..!!!!!
الأربعاء أبريل 01, 2015 7:51 am من طرف بوح الروح
» * * * * * * مِن غيرتي ..
الأربعاء أبريل 01, 2015 7:49 am من طرف بوح الروح